Benfica asks three defendants to plead guilty in email case: “They only acted in the interest of FC Porto” – Futbol Nacional

The trial of the email case is coming to an finish and Benfica’s protection is in little doubt: “Francisco J. Marques, Diogo Faria and Julio Magalhès should be discovered guilty of all the crimes they’re accused of”. In a prolonged closing indictment shared between legal professionals Joao Correa and Rui Patricio, an try was made to refute the model that there was a public interest in revealing emails from figures linked to Benfica: “The only interest was from FC Porto”. Additionally, they argue that it has been established that every one defendants ought to be held accountable, though they acknowledge that “there are completely different ranges of accountability”.

associated to

“Not only as a result of completely different crimes are charged, however the extent of every defendant’s involvement is taken into account. J. Marques”, started by pointing to Rui Patricio earlier than explaining every defendant’s involvement.

“I’ve quite a bit of sympathy for Julio Magalhès, as a result of of his path, and we’re conscious that he’s in a fragile place. The defendant had some variety of contract with FC Porto on the Porto Canal content material. This contract with FC Porto doesn’t match. had the obligation and the proper to cease broadcasting the applications. I admit and perceive that he has to pay, however from a legal responsibility perspective, we apologize. The argument that he didn’t know doesn’t apply. He didn’t take part in the alignment, however he knew that the data was disclosed weeks later. data that was obtained and disseminated by felony means. The program introduced what would occur subsequent week. And it was on the program.”

Regarding Diogo Faria, the lawyer defined that “it was clear that he was not the hero of the occasions”, however, though he was not the “shooter”, he was the one cleansing the weapon, loading the weapon and passing it to the sniper.” “I bear in mind right here that he The work was purposely assigned. He went there to provide himself with Pedro Braganza, along with his portlines, considering he may contribute and he had an enormous job for Diogo Faria. He made this alternative, the means every program was formed and which. He contributed to how issues have been chosen for Marx. He screens, prepares, he first accesses email after which contributes essential materials to what’s the job of broadcasting the program. He himself knew early on that the emails from which they have been obtained have been suspicious. He was there for weeks and months on the lookout for that data”, he concluded about the defendant.

J. Regarding Márquez, Rui Patricio defends that “he’s the soul of all of them” and “the one who gave his physique to the bullets”.

“You can clearly see the means the defendant’s profile and goals are formed. FC Porto’s protection and which means attacking opponents. The Red Octopus. The defendants have dedicated the crimes they’re accused of, albeit with completely different levels of severity. In addition, the defendants take into account dwell that they’ve achieved a lot good, they’ve achieved good work. They will say that they’ve acted with the public interest in thoughts. Both haven’t any wine of regret. Julio Magalhas reveals some uneasiness in his habits. Fourth, the public interest is a thriller which Defendants ceaselessly, in an try to cowl up the apparent.”

To anticipate the closing accusations of the protection legal professionals, Rui Patricio has already tried to undermine the proven fact that Benfica’s SAD, Rui Costa, Soares de Oliveira, José Eduardo Moniz and Nuno Gaiso have lately been made defendants in a course of that shall be investigated. Sports corruption in hazard. The timing at which the defendants have been produced was “pure coincidence,” in accordance to counsel.

“As , there was information lately about the case of the defendants in a case. The defendants in this case will say right here that there’s proof of public interest. This isn’t proof of any public interest. More so, as a result of 5 years have handed and about the starting of this course of. But I Let’s say that the prevalence of arguidos had no concrete that means. The arguidos have been created in a common means.”


Leave a Comment